Kurzban Kurzban Weinger Tetzeli & Pratt P.A.
Nationwide Firm
786-401-4706
Injury, Immigration and Business Attorneys
Aggressive Advocacy and Exceptional Civil Litigation Success

Supreme Court rules against immigrants seeking deportation leniency

The United States Supreme Court ruled unanimously Monday that an undocumented immigrant brought to the United States by his or her parents as a child cannot avoid deportation based upon the parent's immigration status and years of legal residency under an immigration law provision that allows leniency for eligible immigrants.

Generally, immigration law provides an exception to removal after a criminal conviction for immigrants who have been in the country for at least seven continuous years and have been legally registered for at least five years. Immigration law gives the government discretion in such cases, and immigrants can seek leniency in removal proceedings if they qualify under the exception.

The Board of Immigration Appeals essentially has held that that cancellation of removal provision at issue cannot be satisfied by the residency or LPR status of the immigrant's parents. A split in the federal circuits arose, and the Supreme Court heard two cases from the Ninth Circuit earlier this year. The cases essentially held that the government could consider the parents' history under the contested immigration law provision.

One of the immigrants obtained lawful permanent residency in 2003, when he was 19 years old. Roughly two years later, law enforcement arrested the immigrant on suspicion of immigrant smuggling. The federal government ultimately began removal proceedings, seeking to deport the man based upon the criminal case. The man's father had been admitted as a legal permanent resident in 1991.

The man argued that his father's immigration status and years of legal residency could be considered in determining whether the exception should apply. Ultimately, the Ninth Circuit held that the man could rely upon his father's residency.

The second case involved a Jamaican citizen who was admitted as a permanent resident in 1995. The young man was admitted as an LPR when he was 15 years old, according to the high court ruling. His mother had been lawfully in the country for six years when the young man was admitted.

In 2002, he was convicted for a controlled substance offense, and the federal government began removal proceedings. He argued that the time he lived as a minor with his mother should be considered, allowing him to fall within the eligibility exception to remain in the country.

The Obama Administration argued in the Supreme Court that the plain language of the immigration laws require that an immigrant personally satisfy the eligibility requirements to avoid deportation after a criminal conviction. The government claimed that any preference for family unity must yield to the plain language of the law. The administration argued that its high-priority efforts to deport criminals would be harmed if the immigrant could rely upon the residency requirements of a parent in these types of cases.

The Supreme Court held in favor of the government. The justices ruled that the Board of Immigration Appeals interpretation of the law requiring an immigrant to personally satisfy the residency or LPR requirements to be eligible for a cancellation of removal is consistent with the text of the statute and entitled to deference.

Source: Reuters via Chicago Tribune, "Supreme court rules for government on immigrants' residence," James Vicini, May 21, 2012

No Comments

Leave a comment
Comment Information
Kurzban's Immigration Law Sourcebook

We Literally Wrote The Book On Immigration Law

Our firm is a recognized leader in immigration law and litigation. We handle the spectrum from family and employment-based visas to deportation defense and immigration appeals. Founding partner Ira Kurzban authored the Immigration Law Sourcebook, widely used by immigration lawyers, judges and government officials as the authoritative field reference.

Aggressive Advocacy and Exceptional Civil Litigation Successes Call Our Firm at 786-401-4706 or Fill Out the Secure Form Below

Bold labels are required.

Contact Information
disclaimer.

The use of the Internet or this form for communication with the firm or any individual member of the firm does not establish an attorney-client relationship. Confidential or time-sensitive information should not be sent through this form.

close

Privacy Policy

Miami Office
2650 SW 27th Avenue
2nd Floor
Miami, FL 33133

Phone: 786-401-4706
Fax: 305-444-3503
Miami Law Office Map

Jacksonville Office
10752 Deerwood Park Boulevard South
Suite 100
Jacksonville, FL 32256

Map & Directions

Jed Kurzban Of Counsel at Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert, A Law Corporation
1003 Bishop Street
Suite 1600
Pauahi Tower
Honolulu, HI 96813
Phone: 808-531-8031
http://www.hawaiilawyer.com

Kurzban Kurzban Weinger Tetzeli & Pratt P.A.